If we are concerned with verifiable evidence we cannot use ancient genealogies, many of which include legendary or mythical ancestors. From a logical point of view (I'm being brutal here) how can we talk about the Bible as if it were factual or as if its prophecies were going to be fulfilled? Prophecy was always used to instill awe in the the poor sheeplike dependents of cult communities and the predictions made were never any practical use to any listener.
As the GB now recognise 'prophecies' have to be re-interpreted after the event. What use is that! Actually it is an admission that prophecy is useless. . .
I would add that by considering the dynamics of first and second century temple religion with many cults all seeking market dominance, the two lineages (yes belt and braces!) of Jesus would have been drawn up in an attempt to legitimise the particular god-man hero of the sect promoting Jesus as their christ. After all there were "many lords and many christs".